In the age of the triumph of technology, we love specialization. Happiness can almost be equated with being the only expert in a discipline, even if it's the Rubik's Cube. In this context, philosophy seems to be at a loss: the discipline that used to teach how to ask questions about all other disciplines, is it now nothing more than a vague discourse on a little bit of everything and, ultimately, a little bit of nothing? Should it then betray its original vocation and become just another specialized discipline, as is already the case in many universities?
LONG FORMAT ARTICLE, Giovanni F. Ryffel | The worlds of scientists and humanists: two separate worlds? The former often ignore the fact that they are intellectuals in spite of themselves, as Sartre said, while the latter are easily reduced to the category of «literary», as if other disciplines hardly existed. But how did we get here? Is this the only possible distinction?
Le Regard Libre N° 47 - Giovanni F. Ryffel Among the great themes that have animated the history of philosophy, the...
Le Regard Libre N° 46 - Thierry Fivaz It's an awkward situation we're all familiar with. Anyone who is socially...
«The relativity of languages», episode 1/2 Le Regard Libre N° 45 - Giovanni F. Rezzonico Is English the most...
News on Mondays - Diego Tabaoda Last week, Chinese researchers succeeded in producing baby mice after...
Le Regard Libre N° 40 - Loris S. Musumeci From Molière's L'Avare to Danny Boon's Radin!, avarice is...
Le Regard Libre N° 40 - Giovanni F. Ryffel Since we've been living in the society of the spectacle, we've been witnessing...
Le Regard Libre N° 39 - Giovanni F. Ryffel Among musical experiences, there is one that is particularly intense: that of the...